How desperate is the Religion becoming? When they resort to stuff like this, it's obvious that they're desperate indeed:
The high-pitched whine of a low-flying jet engine fills the air as the camera tracks across images of shimmering glass buildings, the Towers of Mammon in an unidentified urban CBD. No, this is not the opening credits of The Apprentice, and dropping out of the sky is not UK Business Czar "Sralan" Sugar in his helicopter, but huge, hairy half-tonne polar bears. Their falls are (presumably deliberately) reminiscent of jumpers from the 911 towers and with visceral violence the poor ursine beasts crash cruelly into the concrete and tarmac with sickening thuds.
The effect is shocking; the message brutal: every short haul flight you take emits four hundred kilogrammes of carbon dioxide – the equivalent weight of an adult polar bear.
And this is propaganda defined. The disciples have good reason to worry, as the news emerging overnight and this morning demonstrates rather conclusively that the underpinnings of their Religion are composed of lies and collusion.
Not since the infamous Piltdown Man hoax has such massive scientific fraud been perpetrated. In brief, a hacker gained access to the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
The files released include nearly 1100 emails and over 70 documents. How damaging are they? In a word: Very.
Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room– he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:
Manipulation of evidence:
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.
Suppression of evidence:
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists
Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):
……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….
And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.
This breaks AlGore's get-rich-quick scheme wide open (too bad it didn't gain traction while the Penguin was waddling around Portland):
The computer files were apparently accessed earlier this week from servers at the UK's University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, a world-renowned centre focused on the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.
Climate change sceptics who have studied the emails allege that they provide "smoking gun" evidence that some of the climatologists colluded in manipulating data to support the widely held view that climate change is real and is being largely caused by the actions of mankind. So far the veracity of the emails has not been confirmed and the scientists involved have declined to comment on the story, which broke on a blog called The Air Vent.
A spokesperson for the University of East Anglia (UEA) said: "We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites. Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine.
In essence, then, the UEA spokesman inadvertently verifies that at least some of the material - if not all - is genuine. This release strikes at the very heart of the Religion's claim that "the science is in". What is in is evidence of collusion, suppression, misrepresentation, character assassination, and other games popular in the world of grant funding.
I do not condone in any way the means by which the information was obtained; the efforts involved serious criminal acts, and the perpetrators should be dealt with accordingly (if found). At the same time, the evidence needed to be released before further damage is done by the "scientists" and the politicians invested in the Religion.
I've discussed before the manner in which science is really carried out, based upon my experiences in the arena of peer-reviewed journal publication, and I've noted the machinations involved in grant-funded scientific pursuits. These releases serve to buttress my previous statements both in regard to the Religion of Anthropogenic Global Warming and of the conduct of science in today's world.
Recent Comments